Events

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Flat as flat can be course.
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: great PB potential, flat and lovely rural run
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Well organised, but do need more loos!!
In full: As others have said, queues for loos were a bit distressing but otherwise, a well organised race.
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Nice flat route, could have had more toilets as there were long queues prior to the start.
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: live 3mins walk from start ideal for me and the 8th time i have competed in it
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Flat and fast with pb potential
In full: 2nd time running this, got pb by over 3 minutes so very happy. Nice momento different from the usual medal. Bit of a pain with the portaloo's but while i was queing at 10.50 (rushing after watching the kids in the fun run) i heard the organisers saying to each other that they needed more so i think this will be rectified for next year. Nice to have chip timing for a more accurate time instead of people having to clock everyone as they pass the finish, not a problem having to collect on the day, though i did see people in the loo que at 10.50 still not having got theres yet so organisers have to run round for people, just plain lazyness not collecting them thereselves. I'll definately be back in search of the illusive sub 40 minute.
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Can't be bad, PB by over a minute
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		No
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		20%
Organisation		40%
Value		40%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Nice prize.....terrible supporters......No toilets
In full: Fairly well run race. Good chip timing and nice prize. Not enough toilets for number of runners. Crowds were substantial but just stood there as people went past. Marshalls were miserable. Got a PB but wonder how well I would have done in a more uplifting atmosphere.
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Needed more toilets!
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: well marshalled, fast and flat. - very enjoyable
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator