Plymouth Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (74 votes). | 21 to 30 of 74 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
2005 race reviewed by: Austen Thomas
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent after race spread of food and drink and good goody bag Date of review: June 6, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tickety Boo
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The best organised half-marathon I have experienced to date. There are so many things that are good about it: public support, variable surroundings, scenic sea views, post race facilities, goody bag, speedy result service. A great sense of occasion!! Date of review: June 3, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: aggie2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A wonderfully organised, well-supported race In full: Excellent all round race. Would recommend it to anyone. Hope they keep it at around current entry no's as just right at the moment. Well done to everyone who's involved in the great organisation. Date of review: June 3, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Scott Glanville
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: From a beginners point of view, it was superb! Good mix with professionals. Date of review: June 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jon Brown
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, great scenery (most of it) and googy bag contest better than most. One of the best unless after PB thanks to splendid climb back to Hoe in last mile. Date of review: June 2, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Bonesy
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: First Half for me and enjoyed all of it considering I hadn't run more than 9 miles. In full: To compare against other races I have done at various distances, this one shows just what can be done at a race to give you a thoroughly worthwhile day's running. I am addicted to Halfs now and although Plymouth was a hilly one, it deserves the accolade of a gold graded event as water, sponges, food and goodie bags were great. Date of review: June 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nuts
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The best organised race I have entered. Date of review: June 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: VO2 Max
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, good value, scenic, something for all standards In full: It's a pity it is limited to so few runners. Not what I would call a PB course but nonetheless enjoyable. The only thing I could fault was despite the fact food was plentiful at the end there was nothing for veggies. Date of review: May 31, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mic
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A definite favourite organisation improves each year,runners exclusion zone a great idea. other race organisers could learn a lot from this race. Date of review: May 31, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: OuchOuch
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: An excellent race, good course, fantastic organisation, great support, goody bag and new PB. In full: One of my favourite half marathons. A large field of runners, a great start and finish, very well organised, an imaginative goody bag, gopod runners recuperation area. Not an easy course, but not one of the more difficult (for Devon in any instance). you can get a PB here, got a 1:26 in 2004 and a 1:22 in 2005. Good fast downhill bits, mostly flattish with a few climbs. Save something though for the climb at mile 12 up the Citadel. Date of review: May 31, 2005
|

| |