St Albans Review Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race (397 votes). | 21 to 23 of 23 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2005 race reviewed by: Runner Martin
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good race well organised
In full: seems leasons from last year with water learnt and improvements made every year, next year 25 years should be a good event
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Grizza
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, water stations needed bottles not cups, but excellent overall!
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Andrew Fraser
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A few hills along the way but nothing too damaging, some traffic dodging too - The facilities were not so great and a long queue to leave the car park
Date of review: June 12, 2005
|
| 
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
