Reedham TenHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 21 to 30 of 64 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2011 race reviewed by: James O'Connor 6
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Could not smiling, after completing my first race in 22 years.
In full: Fab race, atmosphere spectacular and a great way to restart serious running after 22 years!!!
Beats smoking any day of the week.
Date of review: January 30, 2011
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: Topps
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My favourite race of the year!
In full: The marshals were fantastic, the support was great and they even provided some uplifting music at a vital point of the race to keep you going. I have to also say that the goody bag was top notch and the trophies looked fantastic again.
Date of review: January 30, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: sarahbcooper
| | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good experience
In full: Marshals were great- a cut above the rest with pumping beats blasted out just when you needed it, fabulous dancing and lots of encouragement. Beautifully organised, can't recommend highly enough if you're looking for a step between 10k and a half marathon.
Date of review: January 30, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: John Knight 8
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice route but awful weather.
In full: Parking a problem if arriving with less than 30 to 40 minutes before race. Car park area was full, wasted about 10 minutes in a queue before parking on side of road.
Friendly sign-up team. Marshalls were mostly friendly.
Route was pretty good with some ups and downs to get the heart rate up a bit.
Will consider for next year, providing the weather is better!
Overall: nice people, nice route - not bad!
Date of review: March 23, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: slowfish
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Race - Awful Weather!!
In full: Communication regarding the rescheduled date was fine. Wet, windy and muddy on the actual day but a good atmosphere. Good marshalls and great memento! I guess the problems with the muddy car park couldn't be helped - just glad there was 4x4's and lots of helping hands to get us unstuck!!! Will be back next year!
Date of review: March 1, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Philippa Rudd
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: despite the torrential rain this was a great race
Date of review: March 1, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: JILL COPELAND
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: brilliant, despite the awful weather. Great marshalls and organisation. Loved hearing 'eye of the tiger', thanks to the marshall who provided it!!
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Kevin Howard 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Wet, Windy with lots of puddles. This time!!!
In full: The organisation was brill, this was a rescheduled race and pat kept in contact all the time, Pat is also very approachable. On the day it was very wet which made parking a problem and getting the cars out at the end, everybody was very helpfull with getting each other out, also lots of marshalls. Lots of information about the course, well sign posted with lots of marshalls who stood out in terible weather.
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Stephen Panting
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Wet, Windy but Fun!
In full: Wow what a day!!Conditions were challenging very wet and very windy but the marshalls and organisers were great and kept our spirits up.Special thanks to the guys who pushed our car and many others off the car park at the end.The course is quite up and down for Norfolk and would be scenic on a better day.Nice memento in the goody bag. I'll be back for the 10k.
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: TOWN FAN
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well organised,good challenge,very wet,windy in places.
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
