Pine Ridge 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (66 votes). | 21 to 25 of 25 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2010 race reviewed by: Gavlar C
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice Race but couldn't the dogs have started first?
Date of review: November 6, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Peter Blackaller 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: an excellent race, i ran with my dog and everyone was so friendly, we will definitely do it again
Date of review: November 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Gribb0
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race and better organization this year
In full: Lovely scenic couse that is challenging in a nice way. More distamce markers this year and overall organisation was better.
Like dogs but could have done without them in the race, the trails are just a bit too narrow for that although the people running with them did seem to have good control.
Wish it hadn't been 300m longer than 10k : )
Date of review: November 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: RichardTaylor07
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: Fab weather,compared to hail in 2009! Scenic course, need more stamina than road! But is this a human race or a dog trek? They got in the way, people having to check stride. Risk of injury. No dogs at human races. Better org, finish location better, and t shirt better colour than last year! Thanks to organisers and marshalls.
Date of review: November 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Chris Vaal
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent .... apart from the dogs
In full: This was a well organised race, on a really scenic course in unseasonally pleasant weather, but why the dogs? There was nothing in the pre race publicity online or anywhere else. Had I known about the dogs my decision whether or not to enter would have been different. Sorry, but trail run or canni-cross, but not both.
Date of review: November 6, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
