Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
New Forest Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (390 votes).

311 to 320 of 390 ratingsPage: First | -10 | 31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  

2005 race reviewed by: Blackers
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Still one of my favourites
In full: Excellent organisation, fantastic atmosphere, breathtaking scenery.

Disagree with earlier posts about cars. In fact at one point I thought NFMA must have closed down the New Forest entirely!
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2005 race reviewed by: Helen Davy 2
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: First half post small people, not so much hilly as gentle upward incline throughout. Lovely scenery tho', detracted from the pain. Got a better time than expected so I was happy!
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Webbo7
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: This was my first race and with hindsight the hills were alittle tough. But the sence of achievement upon finishing was not to be missed. Only thing that spoilt it for me was the first drinks station couldn't cope with the amount of runners.
In full: It hasn't put me off and i'll carry on running.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Naomi Miller
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Traffic ruined what would have been excellent race
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: jeanser
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Really enjoyed it looking forward to next year
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: C.J. Boguszewski
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: nice traipse through the New Forest
In full: Cars in the running lane at certain points aside, I felt the NFMA did a good job with the course. Only mild irritants were the cars and a bit of single-file at around the 11-mile mark where a dog-walker had two big hounds glowering at us as we attempted to avoid the brambles. Sunny weather and good scenery throughout, especially the heathlands!! Worth doing, all in all. And hey, no one would argue with a PB. :-)
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Claire Goodram
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Beautiful few miles from 3-7, lovely sunny day and great support!
In full: Great organisation, loads of water and sponge stops, and a baggage store which worked really well with a little help from the military! Lovely views across the New Forest. Thanks to all the supporters, and the boy doing a much appreciated job with the water hose in the late stages.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Singing (Christmas Carols) Angel
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A bit hillier than I was expecting!
In full: The organisation was amazing, and I've never seen so many water/sponge stations on a half course, which considering the heat yesterday were much appreciated!

The course was slightly tougher than I was expecting, but managed to finish pretty much on my predicted time, which meant a PB for me on an undulating course.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Longlegs
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Excellent Event, quite tough a few hills but a lovely view all the way round.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: red deer
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A hilly race, very well organised
In full: It was my first HM and I found the hills went on a bit especially at the end when based on the race profile, I was expecting a downhill. Found the markers at the end a bit elusive : could there be a countdown on the last mile: as I had never run the course before and had missed the last marker, I wasn't sure when to start pushing for the finish. Agree that 1st water station should be twice the size (didn't even bother to stop on that one as too crowded) and that New Milton is not the best the New Forest has to offer (to put it mildly). A great big thank you to all the organisers, marshalls, water/sponge handlers and encouraging spectators.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: First | -10 | 31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013