St Albans Review Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race (397 votes). 2006 race reviewed by: Ulf Jonasson
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Too narrow. Boring scenery. Badly planned route (steep hill at 11.5 miles). Could have added some more water stations given the weather conditions (particularly at the end). Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Tickerfly
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice course, but traffic too close for narrow channels In full: Well organised and i liked the electronic chips (tie onto your shoe) to save worrying about funneling thro the start gate. Early road stretches too narrow. Everyone withered in the heat, but guess youy can't arrange this! Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Headband T
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Due to the weather, personal worst by 25 minutes but for overcoming a challenge, as tough as it gets. Great organisation, but course too narrow and the first 4-5 miles are gently uphill Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Peter Heath 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Run, well organised and very friendly. Hot? Yes Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Justine Johnson
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the heat made it awful for a beginner, my first half marathon In full: only so hard because of the heat, and the new route, the marshalls did not seem to know the route or where the water stops were. Very well organised at the beginning but as a slow runner the end was a bit challenging with traffic already starting up and marshalls not clearly visible towards the end so the route a bit of a guess. The real killer was the slow uphill along a busy A road, not much fun along there and not enough water. The rest of the route was generally pretty or ok. Bit of traffic dodging needed though. Why couldnt the race have started earlier? The heat made us all suffer to the extreme. I doubt to do this race again owing to the June heat possibility, but it wont be my last half marathon. Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: nicolew
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Brain-melting heat, route akin to lessons in how not to get run-down by passing traffic!! In full: Wow, imagine placing your treadmill in the Sahara - that is if the Sahara for the most part was one long, narrow stretch of road with a few crazied drivers throw in for good measure!
As a beginner to races, this being my second after the FLM, I found this route, well, boring..not much to look at or inspire you.
For the slower runner a complimentary map was needed as at more than one point there was confusion as to where to turn next. Quite daunting if you do find yourself alone.
The hill at 11 miles (who's idea was that?!) was certainly "character building". However the stretch though the town centre was full of smiles, cheers and a feeling of achievement as you watched people going about their usual Sundays!
The St Johns ambulance crew were a true credit and the Medal and T-Shirt made it all worth-while! Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: GazzaH
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, good marshalling, course a bit dull, marred by the heat..... Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Alan Pilgrim 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Single track at times (not helpful) In full: What can I say? has anybody mentioned the heat? My 2nd half marathon but my first in suicidal heat. Even though I did manage to scrape 3 min of my previous best (think how much it could have been). single track at times which really was not good with so many runners + I saw a couple of near incidents with cars. Well marshalled and water stops good, enjoyed it overall Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Sara Linton
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The heat was hell as was the Folly Lane hill at 11 miles! In full: Course was scienic in parts, but frustrating along the narrow pavements of the Harpenden and Redbourn Roads, meaning you had to risk your life to pass someone (some crazy drivers!) Great marshalls and plenty of drinks stations (although needed more on the Redbourn Road - I saw a lot of people struggling). The relentless heat made a good time impossible, not helped by the hideous hill at 11 miles and equally hideous lap round the lake to finish! Could do with starting earlier to avoid the blistering midday heat. Will be back next year though! Date of review: June 12, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: TrailDragon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Torturous in the heat. In full: Did anybody mention that it was very hot? I was looking forward to this and was determined to do it despite the predicted heat and am glad I did. But it became a case of finishing rather than time so I stopped caring if I was walking or not by half way around.
Plenty of well manned water stops and excellent marshals and St John's Ambulance (saw several poor people collapse on the sides and always someone with them or very near them).
Didn't mind the course although it was too narrow in places and could have been more in the shade at times - I wouldn't have minded crossing the road for that reason.
Also felt that the run around the lake could have done with more marshalling to keep the pedestrians away from the course - nearly found myself in the lake because of a mishandled pushchair.
Would do it again next year if the weather is cooler. Date of review: June 12, 2006
|

| |