City of Lincoln 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (404 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: SteadySteve
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: spoilt by delayed start
Date of review: October 30, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Drunken Euphoria on tour
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good course/race. Bad;y planned, too much traffic delayed start, finish too far from parking
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Skidpan
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: Oh dear, chaos trying to get into the car park, start delayed by 30 minutes, and completety useless funnel finish system again. A great race ruined again by very poor organisation. And no team prizes.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Fat Squirrel
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Great atmospheric race, with definite PB potential. Attracts lots of people that would not enter your average local 10K. However the organisation is horrendous.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wakey
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: The medals were a way from the finish. It was easy to forget to pick one up! I had to stop before the finish because the funnels were queuing back. I couldn't do my normal sprint finish.Sorry to gripe but the parking arrangements were appalling.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Sad runner
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Finish could be organised a lot better. Had to queue to cross the finishing line.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wiz
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: A well organised race, weel worth the trip.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: splisperosis
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: nice course, very fast shame about the finish fiasco
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: ROY LUNT
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: With better organisation the half hour delay to the start could have been avoided (and so could my subsequent calf strain after 1.5k i think!!!). Apart from that enjoyable and great crowds at the finish.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Sweaty Ted
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: They could do with correcting the mile marker positions
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
