Guiseley Gallop 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (42 votes). | 31 to 40 of 42 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2005 race reviewed by: Andy Cousins 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A super mix of terrain. Bottlenecks can prevent smooth running but a very enjoyable run
Date of review: May 31, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Slow Phil
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good trail race with a nice atmosphere - the first part of the excellent airdale triple trail (parts 2 and 3 - baildon boundary way and meanwood valley trail)
Date of review: April 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Peter Hart
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Muddy good fun
Date of review: April 4, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Victor Lendzionowski
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice mix of trail/path/road with good scenery
Date of review: April 1, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Stephen Gilbert 3
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: lack of direction , lack of spark !
Date of review: March 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: IanWooWoo
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good race - good route apart from the canal stretch, great hill !
Date of review: March 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: david dawson 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: What a bl***y filthy run! Good terrain mix.
In full: first time at this one - enjoyed it...and the beer was good too.
Date of review: March 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: michael fryer
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A good multi-terrain run. Clearer km markers would have been useful.
Date of review: March 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very enjoyable mutli-terrain race. Could have benefitted from proper km markers.
Date of review: March 27, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Tim Pocock
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not as tough as it seemed. The hill on the way back isn't that bad!
Date of review: February 15, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
