Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Ribble Valley 10k

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (57 votes).

31 to 40 of 57 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  

2006 race reviewed by: Lazy Chef
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Scenic run on a down hill course, great for loosing the Xmas pounds.
In full: Arrived quite late so was close to the start, however quite a long trek to the car after the finish. I was impressed with the organisation, (I didn't need the loo!)especially the marshall at mile 1 who called out the lap time. Loud-hailer & blow up finishing line, who could ask for more. A good scenic course that seemed to have more down than up hills so probally PB potential, way outside mine need to get off the booze & start the new years resolution!
Date of review: December 31, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
 

2006 race reviewed by: Martin Coates
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great PB race but the organisation was a bit dodgy
In full: I can't complain too much about this run (got my PB 42:40 after all!). The scenery was fantastic, worth the drive over from leeds and the course was nice with not too many hills and the atmosphere was very good.

There were a few problems with the organisation which marred the race for me.

There was a distinct lack of toilets for an expected 1000 runners, everyone had to queue for half an hour or more. The marshalling was excellent on the race itself but there were some rude drivers who cut in amongst the runners rather than wait a few minutes (not that this was the marshalls' faults). The end was a bit muddled and this is the first 10K I have run in years where there was no drinks station anywhere on the route, not even at the end!

Getting the T-Shirt at the start was a bit odd too but I understand that this was to stop queues at the end. This may be true but other races with mny more runners seem to manage this ok.

I seem to be whinging quite a bit here but I actually despite all this enjoyed the race and would definitely do it again.
Date of review: December 31, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Monkey Run
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Only reason not a PB is that there was a pretty decent family party the night before
Date of review: January 16, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Neil Hunter
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Run this race several times it is one of the best for clearing the festives cobwebs and justifying the over indulgement over xmas and new year.
In full: This race is a must to ensure that people commit to the "must get fit" new years resolution that is often broken by 2nd January". The exercise between xmas and new year is a sharp reminder to people just how much they have overdone it during the festive period. All standards, shapes and sizes compete. Didn't do it in 2004 and the only change I noticed from 2003 apart from the fact that they had returned to handing out short sleeved T shirts instead of long sleeved was the queuing at the end. For some bizarre reason they had people funnelled single file that snaked and led back into the sports hall that created an awful and unnecessary bottle neck. I couldn't see the point in this. It didn't spoil a well organised race and in true "Arnie" fashion "I'll be back", next year.
Date of review: January 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Boniface Earl Jones
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Last chance of the year for a 10km pb!
In full: Sceneic and enjoyable with a very fast field.

Following organiser's instructions meant that I got stuck towards the back of the pack so the first downhill mile was a struggle to hit at target pace, but numbers thined out from there.
Well recommended for anybody chasing 35mins or below 10km times.
Course profile is downhill first mile, then 2 and 3 uphill, 4 and 5 back down, 6 undulating with a climb for the last 300m.
Date of review: January 5, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Loki
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Fantastic race, rubbish finish
In full: Great location and scenery, generally well-organised, marshalls did a great job of controlling the cars and a nice relaxed atmosphere. Calling it flat/undulating is a bit cheeky, I can't remember any bits of it that were flat for any distance, it was up or down the whole way. Quite often I got to what I thought must be the top and I thought it would be downhill from there, only to see the next uphill around the corner. Beat my PB and my target for the year though. On the downside, the finish was a mess. Having the finish line clearly marked (taking into account the fact that most runners have tunnel vision by that stage in a race) by something as simple as marking a line on the road would make a real difference, at least people would be able to get an accurate time for themselves. And being really picky, could they not have given out the T-shirts in the hall rather than in the doorway which left me queuing in the cold with my knees seizing up and no water for ten minutes. If they can sort out these niggles I'd be happy to come back next year.
Date of review: December 30, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Mandie R
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Superb scenary
In full: Fast,scenic course. Queued for nearly 2mins to cross the finish line and then was asked by the officials what time I'd done which was very strange!!
Date of review: December 29, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: DanEdwards
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Poor organisation ruined this one in my opinion.
Date of review: December 29, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: beefyw
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: a nice PB course, well organised except for lack of water at finish
Date of review: December 28, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: tommy nod
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Above average race in terms of PB potential
In full: Nice course and location, good parking. Nice and fast course just last 200 meters uphill. Not to keen on finish arrangments though, had to queue too long to get to t-shirts and no water either on the course or at the end. Overall good race worth turning out for just need finish sorting a little.
Date of review: December 28, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013