Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Bracknell Half-Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (52 votes).

31 to 40 of 52 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  

2005 race reviewed by: El Pedro
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good all round
In full: as an ex resident of Bracknell I never realised how hilly the town was especially around the half way mark... Nice drop downhill when we got to the top tho! Good to see so many kids helping at the water stops. Enjoyable day and too 11.25 mins off the personal best so can't be bad!
Date of review: April 26, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2008
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2005 race reviewed by: jóhanna
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: This was a great day out and I would do it again...
Date of review: April 26, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: S3oB
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Not the quickest of courses, but as it's local and the Berkshire County Championship I'll be back
In full: I was in the 2nd lead group that took a wrong turn at 2 miles. We eventually caught a couple of runners who dropped off the back of the lead pack, and I think the remainder of that group were well out of reach anyway, so probably no adverse effects on the overall results, (although of course it could of been different). One of those helping at the finish line overheard me asking the 2 guys who just beat me if they were in that group too (which they were) and was genuinely apologetic and wanted to know more to avoid a repeat next year - so credit for that. Also, 2 of us nearly got run over as a marshall had their back to us and failed to stop the traffic. Real shame because everyone else was really friendly / encouraging etc. Overall a good day, but not the easiest of courses.
Date of review: April 26, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Grizzly!
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Hard on the feet but worth the trip.
Date of review: April 26, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Fair weather runner
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A reasonable marathon build-up race, made more enjoyable by the good weather.
In full: Some people slag-off Bracknell (and having lived there in the past, rightly so!), but the course did vary and include some countryside-like stretches. It certainly wasn't all ugly urban sprawl. Avoiding the traffic was great! Loads of drinks stations. Excellent support, including an unusual number of good looking girlfriends etc to take my mind off the pain :) The start wasn't at all clear... certainly noone was making sure the runners were even facing the right way until the last minute! The finish was very pleasant, although I felt completely mugged by leaflet-pushers in my moment of greatest exhaustion! Also, call me picky, but what's with the hand-held metal detector waving at the end?... surely catching the electronic timing once people have crossed the line is pointless (assuming most people time themselves with watches anyway). I presume the system is a cheaper one than Championchip... which is brilliant (assuming you don't wear the sensor somewhere daft!).
Date of review: April 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Andrew R
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Surprisingly green and pleasant in places. Enjoyed the hilly stretch especially.
Date of review: April 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Nick Plant
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Fun in the Sun!
In full: Lots of underpasses - but at least you don't have to worry about traffic. Marshalls/support was good and lots of water stations
Date of review: April 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Hellmole
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Pleasant. Lots of support
In full: Although there were lots of marshalls they were not at places I would have expected them - a couple of times I lost sight of the runners in front and could easily have gone the wrong way! Long queues for the toilet. Lots of support along the way which was nice.
Date of review: April 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: RacMac
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Well organised with friendly atmosphere
In full: Friendly marshalling and overall good organisation. On site carparking made it easy to get away at the end. Would definately do it again.
Date of review: April 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: TCP
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A great morning out
In full: Interesting course. Some hills but not too many. Very well organised and lots of marshalls and water stops.
Date of review: April 24, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013