Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Cleethorpes New Year's Day 10k

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (43 votes).

31 to 40 of 43 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  

2006 race reviewed by: SteadySteve
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Cold
Date of review: March 22, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2006 race reviewed by: guest runner
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: good race with sufficient marshalls. very disapointed new venue regards changing, a bottle neck for cars, very limited parking which probably upset the local residents who had no chance of any visitors parking close by
Date of review: January 15, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Nearly There
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Good run. Course fine. Good organisation
Date of review: January 7, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: banjo
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Well organised, flat course with PB potential. Improved finish over 2005
In full: Improved finish from last year, and usual good organisation. Definite PB potential (I got one) and a good atmosphere.

Weather was kind, around 5 deg, bit of a headwind on the last mile
Date of review: January 5, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Tony Parry
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: finish was not great but considering it had to be changed due to building work with 4 days notice not bad.
Date of review: January 2, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: banjo
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: 3 x 90 degree turns in last 200 metres spoilt the finish, but otherwise an enjoyable race
In full: Good PB potential if it's not too windy. Good organisation, but the finish was poor with 3 x 90 degree turns in the last 200 metres to spoil any chance of a sprint.
Date of review: January 2, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Jean Bagworth 3
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: need to close more roads were posable
In full: Car fumes were bad i do not sufer with breething problems but was afected by them anyway.
Date of review: January 2, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very well organised. Good race to start the year off. Audible briefing at the start for once.
Date of review: January 1, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Skidpan
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%

In short: Another excellent Cleethorpes NYD race. Shame it didn't rain for the whole race cos I slowed down when it stopped. Good organisation. Good course well marshalled.
Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Fat Squirrel
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%

Date of review: August 24, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
ah... achilles heel
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013