Cranleigh 15/21Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (298 votes). | 31 to 37 of 37 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
2007 race reviewed by: Aido
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: James Goodman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Ultimate FLM 'warm-up' In full: I did this race so I didn't have to do my LSR by myself, and it did not fail to dissapoint me. Good atmosphere among runners (although a shame that the event cannot take on more runners). Drink stations a bit sporadic but I walked through them and took 2 drinks, of which there were plenty. Route directions on course the best I have ever seen. Fantastic location and scenery!
To the organisers: couldn't hear the loudspeaker at start at all. And I was at the front! Amazed that I did not see a first aid station in all 21 miles! Please give some extra goodies/treats on completion. I mean you do 21M then all you get is a medal. Even a blister plaster would be nice!
To other runners: some of you guys (and a mean a minority) are an absolute disgrace to the sport by chucking used energy gels in the bushes and around the countryside etc. Just put them in you pocket!Throwing it away by drinks stations is fine, but even if the marshalls do go round the course picking up litter (which i am sure they do) you cannot expect them to find all of them. I dont want to see this again; its pathetic.
Despit the above, thanks to organisers and marshalls. Great fun! Great job! Could well be back! Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: KeithB
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well done all - Brilliantly organised as always Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: bald eagle1
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: great pre London race In full: well marshall,thank you we do this again, Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Louise Roberts 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: great supportive marshals and onlookers- keeps you going!! Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Fiona Wyatt
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Well organised, great training run Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: RFJ
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Marshalls were great, I now wish that the 15m option was removed so that I wont be tempted again....... Date of review: March 25, 2007
|

| |