Wooburn Park 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (69 votes). | 31 to 40 of 69 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2009 race reviewed by: Steve Chambers
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hard firts km, followed by 8km of road/farm track roads, then 1km downhill to the finish
Date of review: September 13, 2009
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: Paul Terrill
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: One of my favourite events of the year
In full: Another enjoyable event (my third time running), so thanks to everyone who helped. Was concerned about the change in month, but the weather was perfect. I love the 'local' atmosphere of this one, with the beer tent, bbq and cakes, tombola, bouncy castle etc. My young kids also love doing their short run. Not necessarily the most 'professional' event, nor the most exciting goody bag (or lack of!), but it doesn't matter as it is just very enjoyable. Hope to be here again next year.
Date of review: September 16, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Gragar
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic hill at the start. After that its plain sailing
In full: I thought the hill at the beginning was great. Got the legs working. After that it was flat and the last KM was all downhill and pure speed. Nice scenic route and also fine weather to top it all off. Definately be back for this one.
Date of review: September 15, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: McBood
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat (except up 1k and down 9k) and rural. Would recommend it.
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Louisa Hopper
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: loved the course - gets the hill out of the way at the start and has a very welcome downhill section at the end.
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Paul Scullion 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely rural jaunt to start off a Sunday morning. Top hill at start to warm up the legs!
In full: This was my first race outside of having done the Nike Human race. Nice friendly atmosphere, great weather and a slightly smaller field (300?) made it a complete pleasure to take part in. The first 1k hill is a bit of fun; but I guess it spreads everyone out pretty well. Looks like a good one for families with the 3k race taking place after the main 10k. Will definitely do again.
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Bear G
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good 10k with a nicely challenging 1k hill!
In full: Well organised local race with apparently over 300 runners. Good atmosphere and the crowd at the finish heartily cheered everyone home! Absolute beginners may struggle with such a big hill right at the start but other than that the route is great. One appeal to the organisers for next year - please could we have a bag tent for kit?
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Dino I
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent weather, well organised. Will run again.
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Simon Martin 11
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, scenic 10k, with friendly fun atmposphere
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Richard Branch
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A nice run in the country!
In full: A really nice run in rural surroundings. Some people have suggested there should be more water but be honest, there were two stations so how much do you expect on a 10k? The hill for the first km is indeed a killer (worse than the Wycombe Half?) but from then it's enjoyable. I'll definitely be back next year...
Date of review: September 14, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
