Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Pewsey Vale 10K

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (43 votes).

31 to 40 of 43 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  

2006 race reviewed by: Kaye Broom
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Great course and friendly marshalls
Date of review: April 10, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
 

2006 race reviewed by: Racing Potato
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Another minute off PB on a fast course
In full: Let me say this course isn't 'pancake' flat. There are around 3 shortish rises that require you to dig in a little to make sure the pace doesn't drop off. But we're really only talking molehills. It is however a fast course with very clear and accurate KM markings and a drinks station just before 5K.
Get there early and you get to park close to start and finish. Well worth the hour's trip from Bristol. The missus managed a new PB as well. It's a fast field so you get dragged along. Very impressed.
Date of review: April 10, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Steve Reeves
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: RW's description of "pancake flat" is stretching it just a little bit.
Date of review: April 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: patrick slavin
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: excellent, well run race. good marshalling
Date of review: April 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Nathan Jones
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short:
Date of review: April 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Christopher Williams
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Very good,but not flat.
Date of review: April 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Alfie
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Excellent run around slightly undulating country lanes.
Date of review: April 12, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: superflyguy
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Short time to organise a great race, hope they run it next year.
Date of review: April 11, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Tracy Carpenter
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Not as flat as I imagined, nice scenery
In full: As it was my first race would of liked the opportunity to purchase a medal.Enjoyable scenic course with a few unexpected hills!! Wouldn't call it flat.
Date of review: April 11, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: SmallMall
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Nice scenery but not as flat as I thought it would be
Date of review: April 10, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013