The Military 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (65 votes). | 31 to 40 of 65 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2010 race reviewed by: Veranne Wilkinson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A challenging but brilliant event! I had never done a 10K before and I can't wait for the next one! Date of review: March 29, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Candice Siddle
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Loved the challenge of this hilly, muddy route Date of review: March 29, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Lesley Kinnaird 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Absolutely fantastic loved the obstacles, a proper military run! Date of review: March 29, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: michael chinn
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Quicker than expected...organised very well...plenty of dark humour...FUN In full: Really well organised and very enjoyable race..plenty of hills to enjoy and the water/obstacle hazards break up the running quite nicely. Date of review: March 29, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Knockoff NC
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent, mucky, fun Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ralph Ralph
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: sleepy Jo
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Loved the new obstacles. Enjoyed every moment despite falling over twice and spraining my ankle ;o) Date of review: March 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: ALISON Anstee
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Get down and dirty with BMF Date of review: March 27, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: James Dilley
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hangout In full: So much fun but really challanging at the same time. Date of review: March 27, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Noel Thompson
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A muddy, wet duathalon ;-) In full: Fantastic fun, very friendly race. Hard, but great encouragement along the way. Hilly, but not as bad as you might think. Fun obstacles and a free physio massage that hurt more than the race. Can't recommend it enough, even the goody bag was good, though if you're doing it for the medal you may be disappointed... Date of review: March 27, 2010
|

| |