Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Yorkshireman Off Road Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (53 votes).

41 to 50 of 53 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  

2006 race reviewed by: Floralora
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Not a race for a first time marathon!
In full: I ended up doing the half instead of the full because I hurt my ankle but to be honest, I was relieved-this race is rock hard and you need to either a)have no sense of danger or b)not care about landing on your head or c)both.
Great scenery but there could have been more warning about the self navigation as there weren't very many marshalls.More water stations needed too (each one I got to had run out and were waiting for more).
Organisers and marshalls were very friendly though and there were food and drinks available.
Date of review: September 11, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
 

2006 race reviewed by: Manimal
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: Organisation needs overhaul
In full: Several aspects of this race need looking at:

1) Pre race letter needs to accentuate the need to bring map and compass and be map literate. This was not expressed and leaves many non-local or first-time runners exposed to the pitfalls of a course without large numbers of marshals and signage.
2) Signage needed from main village to start, as ended up driving around Haworth for a fair while.
3) More desks needed at registration - only two meant big queues and a delayed start
4) More marshalls and markers or more realistically a greater emphasis by organisers to competitiors placed on self-nav (as pt 1).
Date of review: September 11, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Andrew Kitts
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Killer value at £10 including decent t-shirt. Glorious scenery , excellent organization and plenty of drinks and food. If you want a challenge and enjoy events like Beachy Head Marathon, North Downs 30K, Snowdonia Marathon etc this is a must!
Date of review: September 11, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: HTA
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: This race is nuts!!
In full: OK this is a mostly offroad marathon across the Yorkshire Moors and its blooming hard!! The event is really good but you have to map read or stick with other runners who've run before. There was a serious lack of water stations given the heat and a medal would have been nice after finishing a full marathon.
I wouldnt do it again, it really is hard with lots of hills, however I would go back and do the half which is also run on the same day.
Date of review: September 11, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Simon Alcock
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: chickened out of the full this year, but once again a great event.
Date of review: September 25, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Alf 'Sick Note' Tupper
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: More of a fell race than a half marathon.
In full: I did the half and thought the organisation could have been better as the route was not always clearly marked and there were only 2 drink stations serving only water. Overall the race was good value but no permanent memento such as a t-shirt was offered and the half marathoners didnt even get a certificate! Amazing scenery as it was a clear day but the terrain had everything including bogs, steps and part of it was along what looked like a small stream!!
Date of review: September 22, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: John Preston
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Fantastic, a marathon for £8 with hot food and free showers. How can you not think that's brilliant value! Some people!
Date of review: September 20, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Mark Waller
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: New to the event, did the full. Good course but marking was poor between 9 and 14 miles. Would have been lost but for following someone who'd been round before. Got better towards the end but you still need a map to be sure.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: smiggy1959
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: well marked out course , friendly marshalls, car parking at the start/finish was "find somewhere" would have been nice to have had someone directing you to available spots as its the last thing you need when its your 1st visit
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2005 race reviewed by: Luke Wilson 3
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
20%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good race, great for marathon training.
Date of review: September 19, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  
Spacer image

  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
  • Congratulations Team Target 26.2!
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Start Fitness - discount footwear and clothing
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013