GDF Suez Leeds Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race (411 votes). 2009 race reviewed by: RichSpooner
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, plenty of atmosphere - recommended! Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Chromey
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not a great race, but great organisation. Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: immy1962
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Megs Mum
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Had a great day - good support and hills very do-able In full: This was only my second 1/2 marathon and I was very nervous of the reported hills. In fact they were more like long drags and I managed up them well. I have been practising running down hill and this was a real help - actually overtook some people!There was good support all the way round and I did exactly the same time as the Great North Run 2008. Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Richard Burtle
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Long hill, miles 2 to 4, seemed harder: I'm a year older In full: As before, great atmosphere and excellent organisation. Thanks to all the marshals, drinks station people, and first aiders. (Why do groups of three or four insist on running in line abreast just slightly slower than everyone else?)
Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Amanda Dewhurst 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised but hilly race In full: The Hills are hard, tough for a beginner. Water stations brilliant and well manned. Support from the public very good and spur you on. Easy parking, great organisation, superb treatment for the runners. big screen at the end to watch the other runners. Aching legs today but worth it. Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ayo Bakare
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Sympathetic route, great fun! Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Steve Crick 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A race of 3 halves In full: Challenging course.
Miles 1 - 5 uphill. miles 6 - 12 downhill, Mile 13 uphill.
Well organised race, will be back! Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Vicki Essex 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough but fun In full: A great race everyone said the uphills were the challenge I disagree though I found the downhills really tough and despite having done a lot of racing before this is the first time I have actually been unable to walk the day after a race. Date of review: May 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gary Baker 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, nasty hills, worth the trouble! Date of review: May 11, 2009
|

| |