Sidcup 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (102 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: tinka
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In full: Great for a pb, just need to get your head down and forget about whats around you, cant always get a pb course and a great view, i never seem to look around at the view when im running anyway. well marshalled with lots of encouragement, but it came up .6 short on the garmin at 9.94 miles.
Date of review: February 14, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: janice moorekite
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: PB Potential, well organised with friendly marshalls. Tight corners could add seconds on.
Date of review: February 14, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: joaovencio
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: fast, flat, 3 laps
In full: not much to say that others probably already havent said - quick course, 3 laps ... there's a smallish incline near the start of the first lap and after climbing that you feel you are running downhill for some big chunks of the lap.
Date of review: February 14, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: LEM
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: urban multi lap course, but fast and well organised
Date of review: February 14, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Anthony O'Brien 3
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: multi lap very very boring cheap medal
Date of review: December 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Johnny Lyall
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A great opportunity for a fast 10 mile time. The 3 lap circuit makes it slightly boring. The marshalls were very good and extremely encouraging. Will enter again due to close distance from home.
Date of review: February 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ginger N
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good club race and a fast course
In full: Well done Kent for getting the race on after all the snow. Was great to be a part of such a high standard race (30 runners under 60mins) which shows how fast the course is. Good facilities but have to agree that getting water to the runners has to be more of a priority next time. But see you next year!
Date of review: February 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Damian Murray
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Flat, fast and furious! Great Marshals, just a shame about the water
In full: Big thanks to the organisers for keeping this event alive where so many others failed. A special thanks to all the marshals for the much needed motivation all the way around and for keeping many an ignorant motorist at bay. More water next time please. Lucky for me I had a spare bottle in my bag.
Date of review: February 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Little Monkey
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fast, flat course. Marshalls were fantastic, very supportive & encouraging - thank you all so much. Downside for me was NO water at the end, which is poor for a 10 miler, regardless of the weather.
Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Nicky O'Connor
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Speedy race, worth getting up for on a Sunday morning.
In full: Marshalls did an excellent job, especially dealing with the traffic.The course had definite PB potential. Organisation would have been spot if it wasn't for the poor water distribution.
Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
