Luton MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (269 votes). | 41 to 50 of 52 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
2006 race reviewed by: paul dugmore
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: PB day for me so it goes down as a worthwhile trip from Birmingham In full: PB day for me.3hr 39mins. tough 3rd lap especially with the wind picking up.Good encouragement from marshalls and spectators.Also a PB for my club colleague Date of review: December 4, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Running Bhoy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Tough hills, and even tougher wind In full: Nice hiily course. Excellent organisation, marshalling, and post race venue. And superb trophies - a nice crystal tankard added to my collection. Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Gina Green
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: superbly organised, excellent support from the marshalls In full: This was my first marathon and I enjoyed most of it. The wind made it a challenging day, but living in the Chilterns I didn't find the hills a problem. Marshalls were exceedingly encouraging and the organisation was excellent. I will be up for this one again next year. Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Lorrainec3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: wind was awful but really enjoyed the race Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Richard Boardman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pretty tough day for it - but very well organised event In full: I'm not a great fan of multi-lap races, but as multi-laps go this was a good one. Great facilities, very well organised, but winds made it a little challenging at times. It did gain the distiction though of being the only race I've chosen to wear running tights and a jacket - and there were no regrets! Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: TheMadRunner - http://dna100.blogspot.com
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Testing course, a worthy challenge In full: Enjoyed it, set a pb by about 17 minutes but it was hard work into the wind in places. Almost came to a stop on one of the hills when the wind blew hard! There were lots of marshalls, who gave good support to the runners and police at the larger road junctions to direct the traffic. Would definitely put this one on the list of do again. Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Alen Bryndza
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: second year doing thr relay!!!!fantastic In full: love the inclines wind was marvellous Great!!!!!! Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Monginetti
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: 3 laps was a bit monotonous. Could it have been a one lap run in the countyside. The changing facilities were excellent. Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: grecian 2000
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: "Gone With The Wind!" Luton is a tough marathon mentally, but with the strong wind (mainly in our faces) and which seemed to regain it's strength for the final lap left me treading water in the last few miles! In full: Wow! That was hard work! I do love Luton as an event but it is a testing course even on a benign day. So when winds of 60mph and torrential rain descended on Luton early this morning, I feared the worst. Although the weather had calmed by race time, there were still strong gusts especially on the exposed parts of the course.
Thanks to expert organisation, clear signage, and an abundance of enthusiastic marshals makes this an event that I keep returning to, and many others are voting with their feet as the marathon was full well in advance.
Although Luton has some rough edges, it is also surrounded by an attractive rural landscape and some pleasant villages - a good mixture of course - which kept things interesting.
A lovely bespoke medal, free quality t-shirt, and goodie bag makes this event good value, and hot drinks and showers to bring life back to the embattled body afterwards along with v. efficient baggage finished a good day off smoothly.
Date of review: December 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Spartan Gerry
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very well organised, 3 laps a bit tedious Date of review: December 3, 2006
|

| |