Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Kingston Running Festival Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (131 votes).

41 to 50 of 131 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last

2007 race reviewed by: Graeme Reid
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good endurance race
Date of review: October 17, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
 

2007 race reviewed by: James Hammond 5
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Nice little Sunday morning race
Date of review: October 16, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: N Brown 79
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Ideal training for New York's marathon
In full: Shame on all those runners who like nothing better than to write and complain over the smallest of gripes! Kingston is a flat and scenic course that provides a challenge, and is also a good training opportunity for runners with a bigger goal in mind. Its better than running on your own, the goody bag does have goodies in, and the mug was accepted with gratitude. A big thanks also to the volunteers who were excellent.
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Paul Corallo
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Worth the trip, fast course
In full: Great organisation, enjoyed it immensely. Thanks to all the organisers and volunteers.
Just one thing, would be useful to also have a marker at half-marathon distance so we can measure our time there.
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: topcat455
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Great run
In full: I don't care if I get a mug or a medal so long as I get a memento and that it isn’t a t shirt and at least I can use the mug.

Yesterday was my 2nd 16 mile run after four or five times running the 8 mile course. October is much, much quieter than the April run with 600 runners instead of 2000 for the April run so it was idea for a PB. As ever I found it well marshalled and had no problems with cars on the road parts. The bit between the two roundabouts after Hampton Court Bridge was quite overgrown and would have been a problem if there had been more runners (as in April).
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: BOOYAA!
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: I love that this race is run twice a year (Apr and October) and is local to me.
In full: I also love the fact that this is probably one of the longest races you can get without resorting to a marathon. The organisers are even able to switch your racing from 8.2 to 16 on the day. How's that for service?

After you've finished the race the shops are all open so you can get fed and do a little bit of retail therapy to recover.
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Andi Gaywood
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Flat course, nice location.
In full: The start and finish was in a very nice part of the town. The first half of the loop (16 mile) was very scenic and made good running. The second half of the loop was plain old road running and you could be anywhere.
The drinks stations were plentifull and well manned by army cadets who were excellent and helpfull. On the downside the price of entry was very steep and the finishers mug at the end was a bit poor and did not distinguish which one of the 2 races you did. Also there was a lack of marshalls at some of the junctions in the second part of the loop which caused a few people v traffic issues.
The course was flat as promised, the people very friendly and i would do it again.
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Amanda Z
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Very well organised and great fun
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Kato
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very well organised and scenic for a "London" race
In full: Would have preferred a medal given the entry fee. Overaall tho a well organised and friendly event
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Niki Read
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good prep for NY marathon in 3 weeks. Fast and Flat
In full: Really enjoyed the run. The course was fast and flat and definite pb potential. Good mix of runners. Entry is quite expensive considering you only receive a mug, which doesn't even say what distance you ran!! Though as the course is good and organisation excellent I would do it again as it beats a 16 miler on your own!
Date of review: October 15, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013