Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
BUPA Great South Run

Here's how RW members rated this race (813 votes).

41 to 50 of 91 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

2008 race reviewed by: Marc Caulfield
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Loved it
In full: I really enjoyed the race, despite the weather. I was really pleased as I achieved my target time and in general the wave system seemed to work better than many races. I started in Orange C and didn't get too badly held up. Having said that there were still many over ambitious runners in the Orange wave and quite a few white wave runners appearing in the starting line up. The only other issue I had, was if people are being constantly overtaken, or walking, please move to the side of the road - or don't tut when people plough into you or barge past you! It may be a 'fun run' to some people, but to many it is a serious PB hunting ground.

That said I will absolutely do it again!
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
0
All years
 

2008 race reviewed by: m.d6
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great first 'Big' race, shame about the weather
In full: This was my first 'Big' race (previous max was a 10k) and it was truely Great. The route was varied from the coast, through the dock area and out into the town and back, with some really good support along the way. The start was, given the number of people, surprisingly good and smooth, even though I was near the back of the last wave to go. There was enough water stations, if not enough people manning them at times. All in all, my only negative from this race was the lack of signs at the finish telling you where things were, I managed to wander aimlessly around for about 5 minutes after collecting my goody bag looking for the charity tent area. But by then, nothing could dampen my spirits and I will be back!
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: David Monger
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Same old GSR !
In full: Got to Portsmouth at 09:00 to find the normal GSR weather, hosing it down and blowing a gale ! However, running on the sea front in late October should we really be surprised ? Weather eased off for the race, which was a marked improvement over last year, but perhaps an earlier date should be looked at given the number of people attending (running and spectating). Great support as always, and the multi-wave start help get everyone running in the slightly tight and twisty first mile, though, as noted already, having started in Orange wave C should I really have been overtaking people from waves A and B within 1.5 miles ? Still, a good race for beginners and those seeking a PB alike.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: Jack-E Moon
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: A good first 10 miler to do bit disappointed about being at the back
In full: This was my first 10 mile race and enjoyed the experience BUT being a "beginner" i was allocated Green wave C and spent the whole race dodging slower runners and even passing White and Orange numbers on my way round. I stated i was aiming to run it in 90 minutes but i don't think they took any notice of that and my time of 94 minutes would have been a lot faster had i been in a higher grouping.

Did really enjoy the race and a fast course convinced me to come back and do it again at a faster time!
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: Alec Fitzsimmons
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Fast but let down in key areas
In full: 2 things let this down:
1. The Mile markers were way out, which was annoying as I was using this as a good race to test my marathon training pace.
2. They messed up the allocation of waves. I don't think people were overly ambitious in their finish times; I think something went wrong with the system. My girlfriend should have been allocated with her sister in the White wave, but ended up with me in the Orange wave. I know a few other people this happened to.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: angus pringle
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great Race, shame so many people in orange wave slowed the start
In full: Great race, althought cold and wet at the start. Difficult to hear "mr motivator" as he led the warm up as there was a separate tannoy system to introduce the elite athletes. The race organisers really need to be more strict about who enters the orange wave - I was aiming for a sub 70 minute run - but spent first 2 miles weaving through MUCH slower runners which meant I was 4 minutes outside my PB. Other than this it was a great run - althought the weather in the last few years has put a dampner on it! Perhaps they need to make the run two weeks earlier?
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: linsblake
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Excellent support transforms this race from a dull, rainy 10 miles into an event worth doing
In full: Whilst I very much enjoyed this race again I have to agree with the comments on the wave start - I was bumped down to white A this year which was fine but within a mile I was coming across obviously unfit people struggling with Orange numbers. This must be so annoying for them being passed constantly and for faster runners weaving to get past them.

Actually rather liked the rain this year and not so blowy on the final stretch and will definately be back for more next year but it would be nice to think that the Great Run peeps will start to listen to the runners and keep this race on the list for faster runners.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: Biggles M&Ms
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great Flat, Fast Race
In full: I have completed this race 5 times now and have always enjoyed it. Okay getting in and out the city by car can take a bit of time but other than that I think that it is a fantastic course. There is very little in the way of undulations meaning that it’s has great potential for a PB and is a good 10 miler for 1st time runners over this distance. Despite the rain and wind over the last 3 years there is always a fantastic amount of support for the runners, so full credit to the locals and spectators.

Though I do have to agree with some of the previous posts about people being a bit over ambitious with their entry time. I can understand about people wanting to enjoy the moment though it is a little frustrating coming across a line of 3 people walking within the first mile.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: Phil Harris 3
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: started in 1500th, finished 290th after usual first mile slalom!!
In full: Last year I finished in 321st position, this year I finished in 290th so why do I have to start in orange B behind 1500 runners of extremely mixed ability. Dodging around all of the people who must have lied about their expected time added over a minute to my first mile and so stuffed up my chances of a pb.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

2008 race reviewed by: Nicola Stockley
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: First run in such a large organised event. Impressed by the smoothness of the whole set-up
In full: Only disappointing aspect was the grading in the wave start. Are runners too optimistic of their finish times or is it an admin error? Some runners in white wave C were walking at 1 mile, even more at 2, thus holding everyone else up. Took first 4 miles to get past slower runners. If I do it again, I will definitley look to go up a wave.
Date of review: October 28, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013