Conductive Education 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (55 votes). | 41 to 50 of 55 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
2007 race reviewed by: mrSnell
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: quick run around the park! Date of review: October 15, 2007
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: Tom Standring
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: First 10k race - absolutely great and will definitely be there next year Date of review: October 9, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Scotters
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, contained race - good fun In full: Agree with other comments to date. I was hoping for a decent PB after 2006 race but the section out of the park, the running round the marshalls and the two way narrow stretch put pay to this. However, with a little modification this course could be really special - the park setting is fabulous, the organisation excellent and the atmosphere good - just need to curb the enthusiasm of the dogs being walked on route! Date of review: October 3, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Dave Mansbridge
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Course not suitable for faster runners. Too many turns, pedestrians, dogs, obstacles etcs In full: A 3 lap course within park would have been much better. Date of review: October 1, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Nick Price 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Friendly and flat - but too many twists and turns for a PB In full: The course runs through the park and whilst flat, has too many gates/ posts/ narrow passing places with runners coming the other way to make this a PB course - which is a shame as it could perhaps be 3 laps of the park rather than 2 and avoid the out and back sections where you have to almost stop to go around a marshall, but of course this would also be difficult as it would result in lapped runners etc. Great T shirt and goody bag and nice friendly atmosphere and well worth doing though! Cheers to the organisers Date of review: October 1, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: R D Runner
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A very well organised event....just a couple of gripes....the bridge and very narrow track, surely an alternative can be found within cannon hill park!! Also, someone in the main car park or even signs to point the way to the start. Date of review: September 30, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Stewy B
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A friendly, comfortable race. Ideal for beginners or those seeking a P.B. Date of review: September 30, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Mike Berry
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fast & fun In full: Two laps in Canon Hill park, an extra out and back section from last year and change to a more difficult bridge and a narrow section which was tricky on the first lap, made it a slightly less appealing course. Easy parking and, how often do you hear this, more than enough toilets, slick bag storage and in the main good marshalling easily made up for any down sides. Date of review: September 30, 2007
|
2006 race reviewed by: Tim Porter
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Everything very good - even the rain waited until I'd finished! Date of review: October 8, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Nick "Strider" Bister
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Agree with everything that's been said. Not enough events of this kind in Birmingham. Date of review: October 4, 2006
|

| |