Esher Church School 10 KMHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (82 votes). | 41 to 50 of 82 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
2008 race reviewed by: Kicking K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised and friendly - good running terrain. Water stops only at 2 and 8 km.
In full: Need another water stop between 2 and 8 km as noted last year
Date of review: May 8, 2008
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mark Coxhead
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised, with plenty of helpful marshalls
In full: In summmary, an excellent event ideal for a bank holiday.
The only down-side to the race was the self-timing feature with NO CLOCK! This is political correctness gone too far. I have been doing races of over thirty years and you always get your time and position recorded. Indeed, I have also helped at races with time recording and so I know exactly how important this detail is to race administration and the competitors alike.
Date of review: May 7, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Brian Bibb 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely scenery good organisation, all good. I'd recommend it.
Date of review: May 7, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Ian Tinto
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hard going because of the recent rain on mud tracks, good course otherwise
In full: Was my first 10k and I really enjoyed it. It was quite nice that my first one was quite low key and I'd certainly say that its a nice starter for beginners regardless of ability. I wasn't really running for a place so that didn't bother me although a clock would seem an obvious improvement. other than that well pleased with my first run!!!
Date of review: May 7, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Pritchard
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not one for the PB. quite a bit of thick mudded tracks to navigate. very low-key race. seemed quite quiet compared to others iv been to. good track though, even if it would challenge the beginner. Only compaint: there was no clock.
Date of review: May 7, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: John Simmons
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Superb race for everyone. No real downsides. Excellent medal - very artistic!
Date of review: May 6, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Leona Wyatt
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great day
In full: My friends first 10K - Well done Jo. Hope the fun of running through lovely country has inspired her.
Date of review: May 6, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Harry-up
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very friendly and well organised except for the lack of results
In full: Very well organised race with friendly and encouraging marshals. Well signed and nice medals! Such a shame that you were not able to give finishing places. We can all do our own times but it would have been nice to know if I was in the top half or third etc.
Date of review: May 6, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mad Uncle Bob
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A picturesque and friendly race. shame it had to be on the first hot day of the year, but it was shady in the woods.
In full: A well-organized and friendly race, a pretty route and lots of encouraging marshalls. As has been mentioned before, results would be a welcome addition. Could they not beg, steal or borrow a clock in the future?
Date of review: May 6, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mark Giles
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A hot day, so a welcome sight to see the water station twice! Nice and friendly overall, but as commented elsewhere, the lack of results is a shame.
Date of review: May 6, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
