Hayling 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (47 votes). | 41 to 47 of 47 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2004 race reviewed by: Piers
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good Flat Course
In full: Good Race, which being flat as the proverbial, has excellent PB potential.
Water Station was at 7 Mile mark, seemed a bit too far.
Date of review: December 6, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: The Magic Roundabouts
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyed this one, well organised.
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: alki
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Late water station. Chance to run with donkeys!
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Blackers
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race, great organization.
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: DJ's Papa
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A good event, with excellent PB potential
In full: Overall, a very good, well-organised race for runners of all abilities. Could be improved further by reorganising the positioning of the water station(s), and including in the event advertising that there is 'entry on the day'. However, these are only minor issues in what is a very good race on a very fast course.
Date of review: November 28, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Empty
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good flat course which encouraged you to run to potential
Date of review: November 28, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Artie
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat, fast and pretty good running weather. Could do with more toilet facilities, like most races.
Date of review: November 28, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
