Surrey Tempest 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (59 votes). | 41 to 50 of 59 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
2011 race reviewed by: TONKA BOY
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Thankyou runners!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In full: As one of the four marshalls at the 7 and 17 mile mark i would just like to say how much we also enjoyed the day, we really had fun cheering, encourageing and helping you all have a safe and fun event.
Having so many of you say thankyou is a real feelgood factor in helping out at future events.
We must have had over 95% of you either say thankyou or even give us a thumbs up.
I am also a runner and with probably hundreds of races over the years along with triathlon it is good to try the other side of the fence for a change.
So to each and everyone of you, "WELL DONE" you all did fantastic and "GOOD LUCK" for your next event.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: richard driscoll
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Organisation, solid medal, quite literally. Really enjoyed it
In full: Cheers for a great event. really enjoyed it.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Gladys M.
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyable course, just enough up and down to make it intersting but quick
In full: Really enjoyed this event. First time I've done it. Really well run and marshalled (I'm a big fan of jelly babies at drinks stations!) with runners of all levels seeming to be catered for equally well. Will be putting it in my diary for next year, might even step up to 20...!
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Senior Vet
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic race, great organisation, a few challenging hills but a fast course
In full: My first 10m race, usually 10k, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Thank you to the organisers and marshals. Will definitely do it again.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: BenG99
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, great race
In full: Nice scenery through Surrey countryside, fairly undulating but no real killers. Good selection of chocolate bars at the end, but only criticism would be to have the water nearer the finish.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: mary wang
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enormously enjoyable. Course challenging enough hillwise. Marshalling outstanding. Parking easy and general organisation unnoticeably efficient..
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Run10k
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great race, great organisation and a great event to look forward to next year.
In full: Having decided at the last minute to enter the race and not having run that distance for at least 6 months (although I run regularly), my concern was over the degree of undulation which turned out to be misplaced. For a first timer it's ideal while offering the fast guys the potential for a PB. Only rated scenery a 3 as the weather was overcast and misty (I'm sure there's some great Surrey countryside out there!), although ideal running conditions. Certainly one to consider as part of your London/Brighton training.
Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: SarahWoo
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great first 10-miler for me. Interesting surroundings, great organisation - will be back!
Date of review: March 18, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: kim how 4
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The Good:
Date of review: March 16, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: John Kelly 27
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: first time at distance, definately coming back
Date of review: March 16, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
