Kingston 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (50 votes). | 41 to 50 of 50 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2010 race reviewed by: Jenny Sinfield
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: An excellent race with great PB potential, very friendly marshalling on route, gave great encouragement.
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Rick Gonzalez
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent event, enjoyed it very much.
In full: Nice flat course. Organisation and marshalling were excellent. Will look to come again next year.
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ed the Ted
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Friendly and Fast
In full: Well organised with a very nice route along the river. A shame about the previous days rain which made part of the towpath a bit wet and slippery, but the flat course was enjoyable and fast. Smallish field but a good mix of abilities and an MC with a few amusing quips to send us off and bring us home. Recommended.
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: hopalng
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: I liked the announcer's sense of humour, especially when he asked if there were any sub 30 minute runers there. The 5 km stretch along the Thames was uplifting. Shame that the long winter meant no daffodils in the wooded part. Was that Oxford or Cas
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: richard driscoll
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: friendly race, the anoucer with his portable speaker was great.
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Sindy Grewal
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ruthie84
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great scenery!!
In full: Great scenery and a lovely day for a run along the Thames. Fast run, great for a new PB. Marshalls between 7-8km were great however the others were quiet and provided no real encouragement. Medal was ok, but there could have been more in the goody bag.
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: MartyB
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Ironbloke
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A nice quick run along the river
In full: Well organised, good course and friendly marshals. Chip timing, 2 drink stations and finish line goodies so overall a very pleasant experience. Having done the Richmond 10k two weeks ago (by the same organisers) i am looking forward to seeing the results online later today!
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Blobsie
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely run
In full: Very enjoyable, flat and fast race, with very pleasant riverside section
Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
