Wymondham 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (118 votes). 2009 race reviewed by: David Evans 25
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Flat as a pancake, just what you'd expect of Norfolk. Date of review: March 10, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Puddle Jumper
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised and very friendly. Quick results Date of review: March 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Geoff Pye 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very enjoyable despite the hill and headwind at 18 miles! Date of review: March 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Chris Gay
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good Course, Well Organised, Long walk from finish. In full: The course wasn't easy, but then again when is 20 miles!! Really could have done without a long walk back from the finish and some showers would have been good.
Would have liked something a little more exciting in the goody bag. The Freddy the frog chocolate was an unusual choice!! Still he dog enjoyed playing with the big red sausage thing, until he burst it! (What was that?) A bit of fruit would have been better.
Well one Wymondham for a well organised race. Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Colin Louch
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: well organised,pleasant run Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Karen Archbold
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: long, nasty hill at eighteen miles , not so goody bag. Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Nick Collins 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough, but well measured and well marshalled. Walk back not so goodd In full: This was a really well marshalled course, and the mile markers were spot on with my Garmin Forerunner. Weather not so good, but there again that is not the fault of the organisers :-) Route was a nice varied run. The only down side was the walk back to the start....and without any directions. As I don't know Wymondham I got lost and walked further...not what I needed after 20 miles of running. A great event and training for any marathon that is coming up. Would recommend to others doing a spring marathon. Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: coastalrunner
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great encouragement from the marshalls when needed on the second lap. Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: LEECE
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Very good race very challenging in places... Goody bag not so goody Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Alistair Cooke
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: a few bumps along the way (not flat!) but a good course, and plenty of potential for a good time, if there isn't a strong wind like in 2009! Date of review: March 9, 2009
|

| |