Sidcup 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (102 votes). 2009 race reviewed by: Big Moose
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good Race for Serious Runners
In full: You wouldnt do this race for the scenary but it was weel organised and friendly. I smashed my PB so I have gotta be happy with that.
Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Quixall Crossett
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Ronseal
In full: This was an unpretentious no-frills proper road race, geared towards the serious runner (county championship incorporated) to which a few slower types such as myself were able to tag along.
Well organised and marshalled with good facilities at Race HQ.
Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Worlds End Laner
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very Fast Race - Organisers did great job making sure course was safe.
In full: A big thanks to the organisers who did a good job making sure the course was safe and succeeded in staging the race when so many others were cancelled this weekend. You don't run this race for the view, you run it to get a fast time - good for a PB. WIll definitely be doing it next year.
Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Luke Taylor 9
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Scenery dull but Marshals were good.
In full: Water distribution was poor - none available on finishing race, or not ready on first lap round,
Lap nature makes it a little difficult.
Marshals very good and organisation was good. Facilities good at school.
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Chris Collinson 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good Training
In full: There were a fair number of club runners which from past experience usually means the race is worth running. It might have only been 3 laps of suburbia, but I felt it was a good competitive warm up to the Brighton Half marathon in a couple of weeks. Worth doing
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ginnie B
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: |
In short: Did you leave your change?
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Martin Oates
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Definite PB potential
In full: My first time doing this race, will do it again, but, can we have bottles of water rather than plastic cups please!
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: racer dan
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well done to all involved in getting this event on given the conditions this week.
In full: Enjoyed this one! My fastest 10 miler in 7 years! Thanks to the West4 lady who kept me going all the way! Cheers!
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Olivier Montfort 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: PB potential, very good marshalls, school at the start to keep you warm ... not very scenic to say the least.
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: AA
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A well organised race and friendly with PB potential
Date of review: February 8, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
