South London 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (98 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: Nathan Ball
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: wet and rainy, but did not stop an enjoyable race.
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Sean McNelis
| | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% |
In short: Wel organised. End was a bit wet (huge uddles and muddy) but it had rained a lot 8-9am. My first 10k and thought it was efficiently organised; we were just unlucky with weather.
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Alessandro Behling
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: quite nice run, pitty about the rain ... felt sorry for those marshals ... hat's off to them
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: alexp2000
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Mainly road/pavements with light traffic. Long downhill at 3km and long uphill at 5km reduces PB potential.
In full: Second time of running this race. Course was improved to avoid running on the common for the last 1km (which gets very muddy and waterlogged). Good number of marshals but it would have been nice for organisers to have learned that an open sided gazebo with a plastic sheet covering some of the ground is not sufficient for baggage storage when it's pouring down with rain!
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Julia Lyubova
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | PB potential | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Great race, great organisation. The hill after 5km is a tough surprise!
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Simon Maine
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: Not well prepared for bad weather. Only a few gazebos for shelter and nowhere dry to store bags/clothes. Route isn't bad - through suburban streets - but not that stunning either. Killer hill at 5km
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: LUCINDA POLLINGTON
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great run in horrible weather
In full: Good course and Marshalls were great in the wet weather especially the man at 8km who really spurred the runners on for the last 10mins-thank you!
Although looking like a drowned rat I ran a PB, the hill at 5km just needs a bit of digging in and then it's flat till the end!
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Liam O'Hare
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In full: Well organised in terrible weather conditions. Well done to organisers and volunteers
Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: maurizio lombardelli
| | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% |
Date of review: November 22, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Inga Bellahn 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race! The course not entirely flat as advertised and therefore not ideal for PB, but a great fun event! !
Date of review: November 17, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
