Wokingham Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (598 votes). 2003 race reviewed by: destination comrades
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The positive comments made by the race starter as we crossed the start line 3/4 mile in to the race remained with me right up to the end of the race, nearly 2 hours later !
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: Simon MIlford
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Simon Emsley
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: My local half, run through country side.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Go-KL
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Need to sort out bottleneck at the start, has potential to be a very quick course. A long walk from car park to start of race.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Amanda Benstead 2
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Women's toilet situation is dire, about 1 toilet for every 200 women! Start involves a long muddy track which is quite a crush and then round again in a circle to go down it again. Not a great way to start. Once you get going it is ok.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Mark (Stix) Hindley
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: silly narrow cobble bit at begining
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Congested start
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
