Tunbridge Wells Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (672 votes). 2007 race reviewed by: WestHamFan
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Bit of a challenge but a great race In full: Good to see Kelly Homes start it and a much better start now that it is on the main road. Course was great even with Spring Hill which tends to go on a fair bit!
Nice medal this year as well.
Only thing I would change is to cut out the Langton loop and try to include a bit of the Town Centre for extra spectator support but otherwise great race and will be back.
Mike PS. Just noticed the results are up already and before 3pm on the day of the race - very impressive! Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: dave baker 4
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the hills are a bit of a challenge but overall a nice course& they did very well moving the starttig line much better than last year Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: The Pilch
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised - could do with moving 7m water station as it's hard to drink when you've just run up Mt Everest! Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Chris Glen
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great course made all the better by that hill! Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Alex Sweeney
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pretty, challenging course - well marshalled Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: chicken drumsticks
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hill? What hill? In full: Only joking......! Yeah that was a killer hill. But beautiful scenery and well organised. No PB but a good FLM training run. Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Carole Kennedy
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race - the new start works loads better - really enjoyed it! Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2006 race reviewed by: Paul Allen
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Challenging and scenic In full: Pity the weather was only a few degrees better than last year when it was snowed off. It was difficult to get to the start due to a war games convention at the school next door and cars for this event. However I left about 15 mins before the start and was there 3-5 mins before the horn went. On the course everything was fine, even that hill, except a squeeze through the village at the top where too many parked cars plus an ambulance on course made the runners cut to single file. It was a shame to come back to rural Tunbridge Wells after the Kent countryside. Date of review: March 13, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Si Marsh
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Killer hills and not enough water sations - but still more than worth taking part Date of review: March 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: amosquito
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Like me you'll keep coming back for more Date of review: March 4, 2006
|

| |