Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Tunbridge Wells Half Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (672 votes).

621 to 630 of 672 ratingsPage: First | -10 | 61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  

2006 race reviewed by: Beetlebug
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hills over hyped!
In full: Missed the start by 8 mins due to the queues out of the sports hall and down the narrow path to the start. However, given the cold weather was grateful to have been able to wait in the warm hall at all! Compared to previous races there was more interaction with traffic than I would like. However, marshalls were great and some good support.

Overall I didn't find the hills that much worse than Watford - it was all in the one 'killer' hill, which I had to finish at walking pace, but the well-timed down hill sections made up for it (the last 2 miles were almost all at a pleasant down hill gradient!)
Date of review: March 1, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
0
 

2006 race reviewed by: raskolnikov
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great race - challenging but fun
In full: Start was a shambles - it took 15 minutes to get out of the hall, I tried to make my way to the start @9.40 but couldn't get out of the sportshall door! Then caught in the queue to get onto the road. Well marshalled, great support lovely scenery, hills not too bad (!) nasty medal.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: dave baker 4
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: iv,e got to agree, wot hill, lovely run
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Jenny Curlew
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: I have to say guys, I heard quite a few messages advising people to leave the hall a good 15 minutes before the race to get to the start so sorry, no sympathy there.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Greg Shelley 2
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: C'mon people......what hill?
In full: A challenging and very enjoyable race on a scenic course through the Kent countryside. I've read some issues with people not making the start, but these people should understand you don't just amble to the start with about 10 seconds to the off and not expect a delay. In regards to getting in and out the narrow hall entrance, did people not realise this might be an issue when they were queuing to get into the hall before the start. The course was well marshalled, and drink stops were not a problem. Excellent support from the public considering classic February weather conditions. Will back next year...just hope this hill every one was talking about is included in the course. ;-)
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Richard Roberts
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Good fun and nice testing hill half way round.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Claire Jennings 4
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Challenging route, but made enjoyable by the scenery!
In full: It was my first half marathon, but certainly won’t be my last. It was great to have use of the sports centre, which was a welcome shelter from the cold. The hills were a killer, but when the sleet/hail started, I really began to wonder why I wasn’t spending Sunday morning under the duvet! Thanks to the marshals and organisers for what was an very enjoyable & well organised race.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: BOB THE FIRE
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%

In short: cold windy
In full: already been said about the start line but ive no sympathy for the people who missed the the start klaxon,I was in the hall and heard over the tannoy on several occasions that people should start leaving at 9 45.I wish people would listen!!!.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: turkster
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A really good scenic race. To maximise enjoyment, turn up on time and make sure you've done some hill training!
In full: This was my second TW Half, and I hope to be back for more. The course offers a good challenge, and the hill certainly focuses the mind! Quite a few people have been moaning about the starting arrangements - but as with any race - if you've not made an effort to be at the startline 10 minutes before the gun then you only have yourself to blame.
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: luke Sullivan
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: The start could have been better organised but excellent route and good marshalling
Date of review: February 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: First | -10 | 61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Runners Need
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013