Tunbridge Wells Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (672 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: stephen hill 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Hard but fun
Date of review: February 21, 2005
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Big Tommy
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hilly but pretty
Date of review: December 24, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Roebuck
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very Scenic. Tough early season race.
Date of review: October 5, 2004
|
2002 race reviewed by: i hate hills
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: OK
In full: I ran it once back in 2002 plan to do 2005 and look for a fast time now that i am older and a better run
Date of review: October 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wingman
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Excellent scenery and a tough challenge - a very good challenge !
Date of review: September 19, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Dark Vader
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: I would describe it as very hilly, not 'undulating'!!
In full: My first half-marathon and I came away with a severe knee injury from all the downhill runs. Well attended and well organised, but perhaps not for the beginner!
Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Ronnie Wibbley
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: At least once you've got up THE HILL you can call yourself a proper runner!
Date of review: September 4, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mark Cavalli
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Rupert McPetrie
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Tough course but well worth the effort
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Rupert McPetrie
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Very challenging hill at 7 miles
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
