Tunbridge Wells Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (672 votes). 2003 race reviewed by: BIGMIKE
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: jd
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: rididulously started race at bottom of a hill, so there there was never a chance to feel good
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Neil Miners
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: race HQ was too hard to find and so was the start
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Big6.1
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: LaceUp
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: scolli
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: MarkM
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nasty hills. Very challenging for the beginner. But a very nice race overall, well organised and friendly.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: bobbyc
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Very hilly - worst in kent
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Ian Druce
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great race - although some killer hills, including one from 8-9km! Great marshalls and reasonable support given the back roads route through the forrest.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: thorney
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
