Peter Driver Memorial Fleet 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (97 votes). 2007 race reviewed by: Surrey Scottie
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very supportive crowd and many local residents cheering us on
In full: Uphill finish proved the biggest challenge
Good traffic control by supportive marshalls which made feel safe to run in road. very grateful to them and organisers
Date of review: October 14, 2007
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: James Power 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Pretty suburban route on good surfaces, and good to be so traffic free. Seemed well organised and a good atmosphere.
Date of review: October 14, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Nicki Ingleby
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really friendly - lots of people came out of their houses to support
Date of review: October 14, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Rebecca Wood 7
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Undulating but good fun.
In full: My first race after having a baby and I really enjoyed it. It didn't even seem too bad having to do two circuits. Glad I enetred.
Date of review: October 14, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Peter copsey 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: couldnt find the water at end of run...maybe it was my eyes!!!
Date of review: October 14, 2007
|
2006 race reviewed by: Steve Reeves
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Organisation poor. I won a prize which has yet to arrive.
In full: Quite enjoyed the race, particularly after winning an age category. However, yet to receive to which I'm apparently entitled too which has taken the shine off a little. What's the point of having prizes if they're not given out?!
Date of review: November 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Michael Breed
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good race spoilt by poor admin and some bad luck
In full: Poor admin on finish line lead to much confusion and to date myself (4th) and the guy that finished 3rd have not had our prizes. Unluckey that only one toilet available (the other was U/S)and the time car was a waist of time (i hope they got there money back as it only worked for 1 min 44 sec
Date of review: November 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Martin Payne 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellent 10k race
In full: This is a well-organised 10k. The two-lap course means the runner knows the route on the second lap. No hills of any significance so definite chances of PBs.
Date of review: October 24, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Lisa Binnie
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised. Very encouraging marshalls along the route. 2 laps was a bit boring, especially as you know where the slopes are the second time around! A couple of the km markers were out. Overall Good.
Date of review: October 23, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Becki Hine
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice run, well organised.
In full: I didn't think it was great for a pb - not sure why because the course isn't that undulating. It did seem longer than 10k though!
Date of review: October 23, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
