White Horse Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (226 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: pete.c.
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: perfect ,i do this every year,thanks to all the wonderfull marshalls.
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Barry B
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent well organised race
In full: Second time running this and again nothing but praise for this race. Really well organised race thru' flat countryside,
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Guy Woollett
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Other race organisers could learn alot from this very friendly and good value event
In full: The organisers of this race get it just right. It was well run whilst retaining a friendly atmosphere. Having a 1,000 runner limit is a great thing, small is beautiful, as it means that the facilities and organisation dont get overrun. Other successful runs get too greedy and it ruins them.
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: LucyG
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Slick!
In full: Very fast course, even with a bit of a breeze, and so well organised!
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Paul Phillips 17
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: running dosn't get easier than this
In full: Flat as a pancake through beautiful countryside,the weather was fantastic as well,after the horrendous winter we have had it was nice to feel the sun on your back! roll on next year.
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Runnaholic
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, friendly, scenic route
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: winerunner52
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised, flat, good value "local " half.
In full: It's all been said - well organised half through (almost) flat countryside, good value. Would echo earlier comment re water sation at end of the race - needs to be further away from the finish funnel. Well done to organisers and all the supportive marshalls. Well worth my 150 mile trip - could be back!
Date of review: April 11, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Half_Empty
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Ideal conditions on a flat fast course. Well marshalled
Date of review: April 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: chellebell
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: April 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Trevor Rackley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very good race, well organised and well marshalled
In full: Quick start, but soon spread out to plenty of room for runners, marshalls all very friendly. Course well marked with mile markers in correct place (unlike some recent races) Many thanks to WHH
Date of review: April 8, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
