Tunbridge Wells Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (672 votes). | 61 to 68 of 68 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2007 race reviewed by: Dazza77
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pukka - got a PB 136.56 (only my 3rd half) please see www.justgiving.com/darran
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: WestHamFan
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Bit of a challenge but a great race
In full: Good to see Kelly Homes start it and a much better start now that it is on the main road. Course was great even with Spring Hill which tends to go on a fair bit!
Nice medal this year as well.
Only thing I would change is to cut out the Langton loop and try to include a bit of the Town Centre for extra spectator support but otherwise great race and will be back.
Mike
PS. Just noticed the results are up already and before 3pm on the day of the race - very impressive!
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: dave baker 4
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the hills are a bit of a challenge but overall a nice course& they did very well moving the starttig line much better than last year
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: The Pilch
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised - could do with moving 7m water station as it's hard to drink when you've just run up Mt Everest!
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Chris Glen
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great course made all the better by that hill!
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Alex Sweeney
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pretty, challenging course - well marshalled
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: chicken drumsticks
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hill? What hill?
In full: Only joking......! Yeah that was a killer hill. But beautiful scenery and well organised. No PB but a good FLM training run.
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Carole Kennedy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race - the new start works loads better - really enjoyed it!
Date of review: February 25, 2007
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
