Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Find An Event | Event Editorial | Travel | Pacing | RW Trailblazer | Run For Charity | Organisers: Add Event
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Goring, Woodcote & District 10k Run 2007

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (73 votes).

61 to 70 of 73 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

2007 race reviewed by: feet don't fail me now
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: A challenging race of 2 halves
In full: A race to get the old heart beating!
Panoramic scenery (shame about Didcot) but missed the pigs somehow. I'm still aching after the hills, and it was tough to sprint after the climb. The first half lulled us into a false sense of security. All bvery character building! Loads of marshalls & nice friedly ambience.
Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2013
2012
2011
2009
2008
2007
2005
 

2007 race reviewed by: Emms_S
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Ouch - talk about a slog to the finish. I was doing quite well to 7K then it all went horribly wrong. Pigs were cool though and made me smile.
Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Mad Uncle Bob
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Didn't really enjoy this, but it was probably me, not the race
In full: I really didn't like doing the downhill bit first and the uphill last. I didn't find the marshalls very encouraging and, not being a local, I got lost on the way, the car park was full, and the 'advice' I got for parking - 'you just have to look for somewhere'- was not really helpful.
Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Andy Turner 7
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Gentle start...nasty finish. Great Pigs!
In full: Fisrt race so nothing to compare it too! had driven the course so knew the nasty hills were coming up - literally! Didn't think the marshalls encouraged at all but didn't bother me - they all seemed pretty old so the cold was probably getting them down a bit. Would definately run again, if only to teach those hills a lesson next year...(year right..!)
Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Heavyweight
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Well organised and friendly.
In full: Well organised with the free hot drinks being a nice touch. Perhaps a profile of the course could have been displayed at the start alongside the route - this would have helped the first-timers.
Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: shortstop
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Good fun!
In full: Challenging hills at the end, bit windy by the piggies, but overall, i really enjoyed this! (& got a PB)

Date of review: January 8, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Keith Scudamore
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: A good after Christmas shake up
In full: First half downhill and second half up definitely makes this a different run in good country air. Race organisation seemed good. My only grouse is the poor directions, managing to get lost both coming and going and then having difficulty parking.
Date of review: January 7, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: TippTop
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Very well organised race, very enjoyable, despite the wind and hills on the back 5k..... Will definitely be back for this next year!
Date of review: January 7, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Mrs Funkin
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Hilly, hard work, but strangely enjoyable!
In full: Very chuffed I managed to get around my first 10k so well, evil hills though, not to mention evil wind and rain along by the pigs in the field! I wish the marshalls had done more encouraging, only one on the whole way around clapped and said "well done" which I thought was a bit mean :( Maybe because I was at the back of the fleet and their hands were worn out...just because we are slow doesn't mean we don't need encouragement.

I will probably do it next year though, if only to compare it to this. I reckon after a course like this, lots of other 10k's will seem like the proverbial walk in the park!
Date of review: January 7, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

2007 race reviewed by: Iain Hollington
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
20%

In short: Disapointed
In full: The organisers did a good job, but I feel there is room for improvement. Getting lost on local roads being a newcomer to the area didnt put me in a good frame of mind. I also think at £12 on the day it was a tad expensive for the those just entering the sport and doesn't encourage you. I didnt find it that welcoming being a lone-runner.
Date of review: January 7, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Millet Sports
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Runners Need
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013