Self Transcendence 5K  Here's how RW members rated this race (211 votes). | 61 to 68 of 68 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2009 race reviewed by: Bertrand Bodson
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent organization, very enjoyable
In full: Congrats to the whole team taking care of the logistics. Done perfectly and in a great atmosphere. Will certainly do it again. Also, 10 miles is a great distance, not enough of those.
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Joolska
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Loved it last time and just as good second time around
In full: OK, so with 5.75 laps it's actually more 11.5th time around, but you get the picture.
There's a really nice, friendly, relaxed vibe about this race which is hard to beat.
It ain't broke (in fact, I'd say it's in pretty much perfect working order), so they don't need to fix it.
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Christopher Lumb
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Easy, simple and no hassle
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: rupert mainwaring
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A nice early morning blitz
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Dib2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good
In full: Good early morning run- a bit dull as its 5 and 3/4 laps of the park , but at least you are finished nice and early. Friendly org and lots of trophies!
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Hannah Mornement
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good early morning run
In full: As a slower runner being lapped so often was not good for the head, but I would do it again as it's close to home and over quickly :-)
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gillian ridgley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Only one hitch
In full: I enjoyed myself though I almost got sent round for another lap by the people on the finishing line when I'd actually done my ten miles...
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Sarah Kayley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great central London race - and value for money seeing as you could do this run anytime really as its in a park.
Date of review: March 9, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
