Bushy Park 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (98 votes). 2009 race reviewed by: NICOLA Button
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good race with no killer hills so would be an ideal 1st 10k attempt In full: only disappointment is that there was no goody bag as stated and the medal and t-shirts didn't have a year on them so if you re-enter next year i suspect stuff would be same! Good run though, ran past a herd of grazing deer and ran a PB! Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Julia Bridge
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: scenic run with no mile markers (good if you don't want to know!) In full: Lovely park, family friendly for spectators with a large children's park and a coffee van onsite. Friendly organisation. Great medal at the end. Good flat run with a mix of grass and hard surfaces. Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Karl Bromley
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Well Marshalled but no K markers. In full: Would do again, but probably just as easy for the slower runners to do the course twice themsleves. Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Fair weather runner
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Relaxed friendly atmosphere, good organisation, fast course! Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Tina Lange
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent course-really pretty, great organisation!! Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Geoff de Burca 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely park, well organised except could have done with distance markers Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Tracy Pereira
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Very fast paced - run your own race if you are not that fit! In full: A nice start time, nice scenary, friendly organisers. However, Better markings of the actual course would be good (as difficult to know where exact lines to complete the exact 10K distance are) plus mile markers would be good. Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Shashi Watson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Inspiring and quick In full: Well organized, pleasant route, nice t-shirt & medal. Only slight complaint is 10:30 start is a bit late - why not 9 or 9:30 like most other races? Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Sophie Masters
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first 10k and I throughly enjoyed it! Would definately do it again! Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Richard Johnson 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fine - nothing wrong with this run - does what it says on the tin. In full: quick registration, prompt start , good race for all comers (but I suspect not for really serious runners - unless looking for a win!) medal and t-shirt OK(didn't see any goody bags). Wouldn't mind a mug or something myself rather than a medal , cotton t-shirt etc. but just my view. Some distance markers would have been welcome. Come early for parking. Nice and flat and I'd say organisation absolutely fine. Take note, most of the old reviews below don't seem to be for this race but for some other one in nonsuch park so don't take much notice of some of them. Date of review: March 1, 2009
|

| |