SHERBORNE CASTLES ROTARY 10 K AND FUN RUNHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 61 to 64 of 64 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2005 race reviewed by: Leg It !
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Don't let the 2-3 hills put you off! This race has a v. friendly atmosphere and wonderful scenery; definitely one to put on the calendar for next year! In full: Small field (4-500 ish?) but what it lacks in numbers it more than makes up for in atmosphere and scenery. Yes, the course is tough if you don't do much hill work, but there are only 2 longish slopes and the scenery takes your mind off such trivialities. What scenery? The two castles, misty fields fading into the distance, small lake, statues, woods etc. In a nutshell, something for everyone! Most enjoyable race I've done so far and definitely recommended. Date of review: March 20, 2005
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Ray G
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: One of the most scenic races around. Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Hilly
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Worth doing for the scenery. Date of review: August 28, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Drew Young
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: Very much appreciated the fact that the castle owners had opened the cafe just for the runners. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |