Bristol Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race (888 votes). 2004 race reviewed by: baldylocks and the 26.2 miles
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: i got a p.b.... nuff said!
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Wig
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A pleasure to be a part of. Other races could learn from this.
In full: My only gripe (if there was one) is that there were a lot of people there making it difficult to find anyone. I arranged to meet someone in Queens Square. Silly mistake on my part really as Queens Square had about 4000 people on it! Anyway, lots of people means successful race.
A big thanks to the organisers.
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: D.C.
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: It's very popular for good reasons
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Johnny Storm
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised,good atmosphere,good support from crowd.
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: BennyBoy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, good race
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: stinkytrainers
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short:
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Clairee79
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First half marathon, returning to my home town, everyone shouted my name and had a great day!
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Anthony Blacker
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Might be in the RW Top 100, but still lacks the atmosphere of the Great North Run.
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Paul Cartlidge 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fantastic. My first half - and now can't wait to do another!
In full: Well organised, well supported (despite the rain) & amazing atmosphere. Can't wait until next year! WELL DONE BRISTOL
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: top banana
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race - Hideous traffic congestion, long toilet queues
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
