Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Edinburgh Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race (1467 votes).

71 to 80 of 132 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last

2006 race reviewed by: monkeyrunner
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Good first marathon for me, great support from the spectators, and what was that about no water?!
In full: Well this was my first marathon, entered after I got a guaranteed entry from failing to make the London Marathon ballots.

After all the reports of hot weather/not enough water I was worried that it could all go horribly wrong, but on race day it all went well (apart from cramps around mile 17 that I got over after a few miles...).

Great spectators cheering everyone on, it's hard to just walk by them, so good motivation to keep going. And the hosepipes on the last few miles were much appreciated - glad there wasn't a hosepipe ban :)

Marshalls and fluid supplies were good, I think there was more than originally planned.

Yeah the course is hilly/undulating but that's just a characteristic of Edinburgh (and also Glasgow if I remember right from past travels...). Just glad my training runs included hills :)

On the negative side, the warehouse areas were boring, it was good to get to the beach. There needs to be more toilets around, luckily for us guys there were many trees/bushes around.

Well, after all the press reports that this may be the last, I hope it's not. I'll be back again for the 2007 Edinburgh Marathon!
Date of review: June 13, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator
Or view by year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
0
All years
 

2006 race reviewed by: Shirley W
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great experience for my first marathon
In full: As a first time marathoner I don't have any other marathons to compare it too, but I thought the course was a good one -yes, there were some hills but not more than I get running at home and I loved the part of the route by the sea, and great to finish in the park. There was plenty of water and lucozade, the marshalls were friendly and the people supporting did just that really well. The only thing I would gripe about was the low number of toilets, which meant a lot of people still queuing just before the start and getting mixed up with the relay runners.
I was pleased to finish within my target, now I know I can actually make it round that far maybe I'll come back again to try and improve ! In summary I enjoyed this very much and hope the race continues.
Date of review: June 13, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: uberjogger
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Well marshalled on the day. Some organisational tweaks needed. Too hot!!!
In full: A mixed course - start and finish superb, a bit dull in the middle. Mile markers seemed to be poorly measured (according to my Garmin). Hillier than you would suspect from viewing the 'course profile' on the website. Well marshalled and no complainte about the water/sports drink stations.

The relay race doesn't mix well with the marathon - every few miles you get barged out of the way by geezers on a mission.

Goodie bag was a joke (what was with the plastic soldier with parachute???). Nice medal, though.

Still, special for me as my first marathon. Fantastic finish by Arthur's seat.
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Martin Hull
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: super marathon
In full: Enjoyed this very much. It was hot but there were plenty of water and lucozade stations so no excuse for dehydrating. I can't believe reports in the Scotsman that 2500 people didn't turn up for the race because of the heat - shocking.
It a pity there was no timing mat at the halfway point. One or two mile markers (mile 11?) seemed out of place but apart from that it appeared well-organised to me. Fantastic finish (apart from the climb from Portobello beach!) in Holyrood Park.
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: chubsy
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Lovely city, great race and good atmosphere. Has potential to grow into big city marathon. Organisers seemed to respond well to hot weather - shame they couldn't flatten the last three miles!
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: RunnerG
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: good race, very hot
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: jeanser
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Route much better than last year
In full: last year Edinburgh was my first marathon this one was my 2nd there was much improvement really enjoyed the start in princess street, the spectators were great and so were the marshalls
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Mr. Fink-Nottle
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
40%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: What was that about it being flatter??!!
In full: The revised route turned out to be more undulating than previously, in my humble opinion. Though the flat cycle lanes were completely removed, they were replaced in part my a long undulating climb somewhere between miles 9 - 11. The start of the race was hillier too. Although I just beat last year's effort by 1min 45 secs approx, to say the route was flatter seemed ridiculous. The event needs a major sponsor to bolster its profile and make it far more attractive. Rubbish goodie bag, too, sadly. Mind you, the heat didn't help, and I understand one of the Kenyans had to drop out because of heat exhaustion. How strange is that?
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: Stewy
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: This was my second marathon, and would definately run in Edinburgh again.
In full: Thought it was a nice number to be running, not too congested. Found it hilly at times, especially around mile 24. Overall I thought it was well organised and they did have plenty of drinks. Appreciated the box of fruit the fellow had with bananas etc, at one point later on. Was slightly confused as to what mile I was at, as others have mentioned but didn't know if it was me or the markers!Enjoyed the atmosphere at the finish too. Would definately do this again.
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

2006 race reviewed by: markhw
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
100%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Better than 20 Capstan full strength (nearly)
In full: My fist marathon after 25 years of smoking et al.
Did a personal best of just over six hours but I did it.I swear blind I won't do it again but perhaps I might.
Great support, other runners/walkers/marshalls/crowd were fantastic and always encouraging.
Too Too hot but the advice from here and marshalls on the day was very helpful
Date of review: June 12, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  | +10 | Last
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Millet Sports
Runners Need
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013