Studland Stampede 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (73 votes). | 71 to 73 of 73 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
2006 race reviewed by: ASB
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not the best one to wear new trainers on! but good race nonetheless In full: This was my first multi terrain race and it was certainly challenging compared to road running. The soft sand at about 8km almost finished me off. But would definitely try it again. Date of review: October 29, 2006
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: tiny tia
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A mix of terain, really enjoyable, great atmosphere. In full: Great day out to be able to bring family along to plat about on the beach where the race starts and finishes. Very well organized with plenty of parking, proper loos, tea shop and friendly atmosphere. A mix of terrain, mud, beach, track, soft and wet sand included, plenty of steep uphill parts and water station about half way with Jellybabies!! Would definatly do this one again:0) Date of review: October 29, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Chris Nesbit
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great fun and good terrain differences In full: First race and was very happy with the event. Everyone was very friendly. for those who are used to multi-terrain then this is a course that you could get a good time on. From punishing sand dunes to boggy-bits and the long home stretch along the beach was great. Great view when up high. Longer than advertised - actually 12.8Km. Recommended. Date of review: October 23, 2005
|

| |