Fradley 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (295 votes). 2010 race reviewed by: Fat Foxy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good local race
In full: Not sure if was my lack of a finishing kick or a big gap between the 9km and finish line!
Date of review: March 17, 2010
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Russell Churchley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Had goodfun. Nice event good people. needs more loos. Lots of people and 3 loos don't mix.
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: mark Hedges
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: Really enjoyable 1st 10k race, what is problem with all the "not enough toilets" comments, I went straight in??
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: DerekB
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Quick, flat and enjoyable
In full: My first ever race, which happened to be local. Good flat course and set a good PB. This would have been better as I was on a 200m sprint at the end which I could not complete as the last 20m was a sharp left hand dog leg through a farmers gate which funnelled down to a narrow finish line, could have got past a small crowd.
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Paul Butler 3
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fastest 10k route ever! 3 mins off my PB $5 mins from 48 so well pleased!
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: adam boyce 4
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Adnad
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Same every year - great route, poor toilet facilities
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Mark Bloxham
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Katy Draper
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great run, converted my husband even! Would have helped to have some signage to the start of the 2K please.
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: VeganRun
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat, rural course with excellent marshalling but not enough toilets!
In full: This is a good course, flat and fast as advertised. However, there were not enough toilets and having to queue on arrival to get chips seemed silly rather than sending them out in the post.
The marshalling on the course was superb, well laid out and friendly supportive marshalls. However, there were a lot of people bunched up at the finishing line which may need to be improved.
It's not cheap to enter but you do get a medal, T shirt and fruit at the end which was nice. Overall, a good race with only some minor downsides.
Date of review: March 15, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
