Boscombe 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (87 votes). | 81 to 87 of 87 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
2005 race reviewed by: C1 POL (M.)
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good to start and finish on a proper athletics track - 1k markers weren't particularly clear but well marshalled
Date of review: November 28, 2005
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: chunky.
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nicely organised, with stadium start and finish, only one serious hill
In full: Not a pb course, but not too hard by any means. Course a little narrow in places not that I do much overtaking.
Best prize ever.. a useful diary!
Date of review: November 28, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Gixerstu
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Largish hills and some slippery areas mean no PB here!
In full: Great to start and finish in the stadium though and some good fun people to run with.
Agree about the women-I've never seen so many gorgeous runners in one race
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: David Hagelthorn
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First time this year (2004) and thoroughly enjoyed it. Lots of good looking women in Bournemouth!
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: JellyLegs
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good mixed course
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: ellamac
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: More than midly undulating I think!!!!!!!!!
Date of review: November 29, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Shropshire lass
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: V wet, some cross country style running through muddy parks-great fun!
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
