Stoop 5Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (8 votes). | 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2004 (4 votes) | | Overall score | | 95% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 95% | | PB potential | | 53% | | Atmosphere | | 90% | | Organisation | | 85% | | Value | | 95% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 73% |
|
|
2004 race reviewed by: Hamertime
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great atmosphere, on the moors above Haworth, bit of climb, bit of boogy peat, and frozen topped butts of icy water to wash your legs in after. a great way to sample fell running. Date of review: December 21, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: omega man
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: First fell race, brilliant fun. Drove over 200 miles for it, will do it next year Date of review: December 21, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Slow Phil
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: had a great time and will definitely do this again In full: the new course route was better for me than the previous year with a more gradual climb the icy conditions actually seemed to make things easier as the mud was a bit firmer - don't know if anyone else thaought this
Date of review: December 19, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: david chapple
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

|