Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
Adidas Flora London Half-Marathon

Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (584 votes).

1 to 10 of 50 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  4  5  

The big picture 2004 (50 votes)
Overall score
 
68%
How many would do it again?
 
74%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
54%
PB potential
 
77%
Atmosphere
 
65%
Organisation
 
74%
Value
 
66%
Beginner-friendliness
 
77%
Or view by year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2001
All years
 

2004 race reviewed by: Prue Blamey
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: good training for London Marathon
Date of review: March 23, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Bodge
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: An average race
Date of review: December 23, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Maestro 2
Overall score
 
40%
Would you do it again?
 
No
 
Details:
Scenery
 
20%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Quite a poor event. Extremely boring scenery. Facilities basic and getting out of the car park was horrendous
Date of review: December 23, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: addictive runner
Overall score
 
100%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
100%
Organisation
 
100%
Value
 
100%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Amazing experience. Flat course but well worth it!
In full: Despite the awful weather conditions last year it was probably one of the best runs I've ever done. I'd definitely recommend anyone to do it (even if you've never completed a half marathon before)
Date of review: December 22, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Trevor Remnant
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Great day out
Date of review: December 13, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Colby
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
80%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: My first half marathon, and my first competetive race since doing a 10 k about 15 years ago. Really enjoyed my day out.
Date of review: December 13, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: IronMan2
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Nice and flat. You can keep an even pace
Date of review: December 9, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Clev
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
100%

In short: Great intrdoduction to racing
Date of review: December 6, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: Nogr8nrg
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Done this race 2003/2004, Well organized ,Very flat PB course,Getting away from the race has been a problem.OK if you leave very early or very late (Not with the mass 2Hr finishers)
Date of review: December 6, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

2004 race reviewed by: AndyMcfluff
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: This was my first haf marathon and a great event. The novelty of running round Silverstone wil never wear off!
Date of review: December 2, 2004

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  3  4  5  
Spacer image

  • Runner's recipes with Sarah
  • Striders Edge preview
  • Promotion: Win a place at Red Bull Steeplechase 2013
  • Promotion: Brighton rocks
  • Promotion: Timex setting the pace
  • Inside our July 2013 issue
  • Preview: Body of evidence
  • Promotion: Asics Target 26.2
  • Body of evidence
  • Run to lose
Runners Need
Millet Sports
ah... achilles heel
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013