Kingston Running Festival MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (131 votes). | 1 to 10 of 19 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2003 (19 votes) | | Overall score | | 69% | | How many would do it again? | | 95% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 71% | | PB potential | | 79% | | Atmosphere | | 66% | | Organisation | | 75% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 69% |
|
|
2003 race reviewed by: denise hogg
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: great to run along by hampton court
Date of review: September 20, 2006
|
2003 race reviewed by: Space
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great for beginners and those looking to train for LM
Date of review: January 20, 2005
|
2003 race reviewed by: Mike Clyne
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Super fast / flat course. Good organisation. Easy travel options
Date of review: October 5, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: S mile r
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Leyts
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Run it three time, great run, well organized, very scenic.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: mark robson
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Saffie
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: [16-mile] Well organised with a nice atmosphere - not bad. Biggest attraction is when it is - practice for London.
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: William Paul
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: [16-mile] Very expensive, they make you buy your t-shirt on top of a £15 entry fee! Scenery not as great as everyone says (only 1/3 of the run is by the river)
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: simon bendle
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: [16-mile]
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: Sorehip
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: [8-mile] Still not enough marshalls
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
